Take that you little bugs.
10 April 2012
08 April 2012
UPDATE: Manson Parole Denied 12th Time
Charles Manson will never, ever be paroled. But not primarily for the concerns the Parole Board and public offer as reasoning. Okay, so Charlie could still be a danger to society. And yes, his death sentence was already reduced to life in prison. However, Manson, and most likely his co-defendants in the Tate-Labianca trial, can never be released under even the tightest parole conditions.
Two reasons:
1. Charlie wouldn't last a week, maybe not a day, without being assassinated by someone who feels that justice has been delayed; or, by someone who wants the infamy/credit of obliterating the Greatest Monster Ever of the media and pop-culture. Either way, they'd become second to Jack Ruby. Or vice versa.
So, the State of California cannot release Manson because it is clear that he faces unreasonably high risk from the public. It's the same reason Manson has never been in gen-pop. As protected as he can be there, several attacks on him have been made and one resulted in his being set on fire by another prisoner. For one reason or another, everyone guns for Manson.
2. The public outcry over parole for Manson would force its revocation long before the release date arrived. Fear and outrage would be so great that there is no question that it will never go through. Parole is a political process: prison officials and parole board members would not expose themselves to such public disapproval, even hatred.
The threat of condemnation by the public is a compelling reason for keeping the "Manson Women" incarcerated, too. Leslie van Houten may be paroled if she makes it to 80 or so, but even then officials could determine that it will cause too big an uproar. Susan Atkins was denied parole up until her death from painful, debilitating cancer.
Manson understands the situation he is in—he hasn't attended his parole hearings for the last 15 years. He's been denied 11 times in a row. The "Manson Women" do not, however, seem to understand. They are obviously distraught at their hearings, they present signatures, they list their (numerous and admirable) contributions to the lives of other women, but they are always denied parole. You just can't release the Manson Family.
Two reasons:
1. Charlie wouldn't last a week, maybe not a day, without being assassinated by someone who feels that justice has been delayed; or, by someone who wants the infamy/credit of obliterating the Greatest Monster Ever of the media and pop-culture. Either way, they'd become second to Jack Ruby. Or vice versa.
![]() |
A Krshna Devotee set fire to Manson in prison. |
2. The public outcry over parole for Manson would force its revocation long before the release date arrived. Fear and outrage would be so great that there is no question that it will never go through. Parole is a political process: prison officials and parole board members would not expose themselves to such public disapproval, even hatred.
The threat of condemnation by the public is a compelling reason for keeping the "Manson Women" incarcerated, too. Leslie van Houten may be paroled if she makes it to 80 or so, but even then officials could determine that it will cause too big an uproar. Susan Atkins was denied parole up until her death from painful, debilitating cancer.
![]() |
Susan Atkins |
![]() |
Patricia Krenwinkle |
![]() |
Leslie van Houten |
Manson understands the situation he is in—he hasn't attended his parole hearings for the last 15 years. He's been denied 11 times in a row. The "Manson Women" do not, however, seem to understand. They are obviously distraught at their hearings, they present signatures, they list their (numerous and admirable) contributions to the lives of other women, but they are always denied parole. You just can't release the Manson Family.
05 April 2012
In Defense of Charles Manson
Yes, you read that right. But hear me out . . .
![]() |
The perfect example of how tattoos look silly when you get older. |
Charles Manson, age 77, in prison for the last 40+ years, has been all over the news lately because California State Corrections had to take new photos of him. "His appearance had changed." See right. But I'm not here to defend Charlie's appearance...
I'm reacting to the latest stream of calls for Manson to be "tied to a stake and burned," "boiled in tar," "hung from a tree until his head pulls off," or at any rate put to death in some way, preferably slowly and painfully.
From this, I gather that there are many falsely held beliefs about who committed the so-called Manson murders, what Manson's role was, and how Manson was turned into "The World's Most Dangerous Man."
*****
![]() |
Geraldo interview, 1989 |
The U.S. and much of the rest of the world has lost sight of the fact that Charlie Manson is mortal. He has no special magic, no uncanny powers, no supernatural way to cause a person's death. (I don't give credence to Prosecutor Bugliosi's absurd claim that Charlie once stopped his watch.)
You could have accompanied Geraldo Rivera to meet Manson in prison and been in more danger from Geraldo than from him. The frisson you felt when first facing Manson would not be Charlie "getting inside your head," at least not by his own powers; rather, it would come out of the decades of misinformation portraying Manson as the evil and powerful Prince of Darkness. So who or what has created this image?
*****
![]() |
Aura enhanced. |
The pop-culture myth of Manson as Boogeyman was created by the U.S. establishment of the 60s-70s, using the powerful and rising tool of media. Manson was a thief, a drifter, an ex-con who with his "Family" unwittingly became the symbol of all things "threatening" about hippie culture. READ: Anti-war sentiment. The public face of which was "flower children" and not the educators, clergy, parents, etc, involved in the movement. Nixon himself had said in a speech that "opposition to the war in this country is the greatest single weapon working against the U.S. [in Viet Nam]." Manson was turned into a symbolic monster to frighten the masses and turn them against the counter-culture.
![]() |
During the trial. Can you imagine? |
The political campaign against Manson created an other-worldly image, well-maintained to this day, that leads people to hold simultaneously the naturally conflicting beliefs that Charlie is a clown and that he is Satan. The combination is powerful indeed: with roots in the Jungian Shadow, the insane criminal (think Hannibal Lector), the Joker, the Boogeyman. Charlie, for more than half his life, has played along.
![]() |
Well, okay, he's a clown. |
*****
![]() |
No, this man can't control you, for chrissakes, but the media can. |
Now consider that Manson wasn't present at the Tate-Labianca murders.(Didja know that?) He was charged and convicted of conspiracy to commit murder (and thus the seven murders as well). The only basis for his involvement in this conspiracy was that he reportedly told the gang, as they left the first night, "Do something witchy." Insufficient evidence, wouldn't you think, to prove he conspired to murder seven people. Remember: He's not magic.
The real murderer-murderer of the Tate and Labianca households was Tex Watson. Watson drove the car, chose the homes, and made sure the girls involved themselves in the slaughter. According to his own account, he personally stabbed all the victims to death.
Oh, and he shot a few, too. That's right—Tex Watson brought a gun along. And instructed the girls to bring Bowie knives. The girls admit to stabbing some victims, but under Tex's pressure. See his website where he admits it and, unless I'm imagining it, sounds as if he still revels a bit in the retelling. (www.aboundinglove.org)
For most of his time incarcerated, Tex has been in California's cushiest minimum security prison, provided with amenities and opportunities. For example, he was married and has four children through conjugal visits (pause); he had free range of the grounds and workshops "on campus"; and he started and continues to run the non-profit ministry that he, as administrator, gets a handsome salary from. Lots of people support Tex and his Christian work, and he can buy lots of great stuff with his money. If the commissary doesn't have what he wants they will order it, "within reason." They're very accommodating, and Tex has always been a "star" within the prison.
![]() |
"The Most Dangerous Man Alive" Hyperbolic much? |
Tex Watson should have been made the Boogeyman, but the media had been pulled back by the time he went to trial and after Manson was convicted. The latter was the evil, drug-addled, violent and murderous hippie who "ended the 60s." All you had to do was look at him! The establishment's goal had been pulled off: Hippie = Threat to Society.
The establishment swept Tex's trial under the rug so as not to spoil the anti-counter-culture message that had been crafted. Tex's starring role in the murders was buried so the media could continue to turn the public against the hippies and the anti-war movement.
Probably very few people can even tell you Tex's real first name. (It's Charles. The reporting was manipulated so that an inconvenient coincidence—two Charlies—wouldn't muddy the image of Manson as Public Enemy.) I wonder how many people know even that Tex was there and that Charlie was not, and that Tex will tell you that he killed all seven victims?
![]() |
Tex didn't have the look for
the establishment's 'Have-Nots
vs. Haves' spin on the murders. |
![]() |
Ah, but Charlie did. |
The establishment swept Tex's trial under the rug so as not to spoil the anti-counter-culture message that had been crafted. Tex's starring role in the murders was buried so the media could continue to turn the public against the hippies and the anti-war movement.
Probably very few people can even tell you Tex's real first name. (It's Charles. The reporting was manipulated so that an inconvenient coincidence—two Charlies—wouldn't muddy the image of Manson as Public Enemy.) I wonder how many people know even that Tex was there and that Charlie was not, and that Tex will tell you that he killed all seven victims?
*****
![]() |
"The Other" A woman, a lesbian, horribly abused. |
To return to my main point, we should be wary of swallowing the media's message without thinking more for ourselves. We should refuse to buy into the hype surrounding Manson and every other media-manipulated symbol used to lead us toward one agenda or another. Charlie may deserve to be in prison (though I don't know what for by now...) but letting ourselves be fooled about what he is and who is really responsible for such terrible crimes does nothing in the name of justice and nothing for a larger understanding.
![]() |
"The Other" A gay man, mentally ill, psychotic. |
![]() |
"The Other" A child star, an addict, an alcoholic, a woman hunted down and humiliated by what must seem to be the whole world. |
All this is about controlling the masses with scary stories, dark folklore, cautionary tales, and monsters. We could all be a little more savvy about it. This isn't the Middle Ages.
*****
![]() |
What assumptions underlie this headline? |
For an example of how the Manson myth continues to evolve—and has become a Frankenstein's Monster the establishment certainly did not foresee—check out the Manson Fan Club link below. Don't think that's a one-off, though; it's just an example. There are Manson "followers" world-wide. Find them in Malaysia and Brazil. Find them on Facebook and Twitter. Really.
And from the Manson Memorabilia Store. . .
Charles Manson Rosary, $28
30 March 2012
Asa to the Mama This Morning
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)